SHREC 2006

- 3D shape retrieval contest -
Home Classification & Relevance assessment Performance measures used
Results:
Runfile(s) per participant Per query All runfiles

Results

All Runfiles

Numbers:

Mean Average Precision(highly relevant)
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Shilane et al. 3 0.5365884
2 Zaharia et al. 1 0.5034908
3 Makadia et al. 2 0.4869458
4 Shilane et al. 2 0.4804158
5 Makadia et al. 1 0.47420755
6 Daras et al. 1 0.44749674
7 Papadakis et al. 1 0.43900007
8 Shilane et al. 1 0.4071983
9 Chaouch et al. 1 0.40397248
10 Chaouch et al. 2 0.3405854
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.33446857
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.3154294
13 Laga et al. 1 0.23276776
14 Laga et al. 2 0.2227504
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.170842
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.15204048
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.14377064
Mean Average Precision(relevant)
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Shilane et al. 3 0.5192144
2 Zaharia et al. 1 0.50937635
3 Shilane et al. 2 0.49619025
4 Makadia et al. 2 0.43641654
5 Makadia et al. 1 0.419766
6 Shilane et al. 1 0.41690922
7 Daras et al. 1 0.3952254
8 Papadakis et al. 1 0.38988617
9 Chaouch et al. 1 0.35433546
10 Chaouch et al. 2 0.31655896
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.26842454
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.24938989
13 Laga et al. 1 0.21350855
14 Laga et al. 2 0.20030689
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.19559072
16 Jayanti et al. 1 0.16447993
17 Jayanti et al. 3 0.16337174
Mean First Tier(highly relevant)
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 44.769863%
2 Makadia et al. 1 43.77565%
3 Daras et al. 1 42.7465%
4 Papadakis et al. 1 41.856834%
5 Shilane et al. 3 40.866444%
6 Zaharia et al. 1 39.211567%
7 Chaouch et al. 1 38.127415%
8 Shilane et al. 2 37.90569%
9 Chaouch et al. 2 32.1507%
10 Shilane et al. 1 30.97117%
11 Makadia et al. 3 29.98721%
12 Makadia et al. 4 28.429304%
13 Laga et al. 1 24.10867%
14 Laga et al. 2 23.125643%
15 Jayanti et al. 2 17.276148%
16 Jayanti et al. 3 15.947755%
17 Jayanti et al. 1 15.057998%
Mean First Tier(relevant)
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 40.549805%
2 Makadia et al. 1 38.78685%
3 Shilane et al. 3 37.40131%
4 Papadakis et al. 1 37.400352%
5 Shilane et al. 2 37.307213%
6 Daras et al. 1 37.03405%
7 Zaharia et al. 1 34.203205%
8 Chaouch et al. 1 34.07872%
9 Chaouch et al. 2 30.317457%
10 Shilane et al. 1 29.791983%
11 Makadia et al. 3 25.408506%
12 Makadia et al. 4 24.532955%
13 Laga et al. 2 22.231548%
14 Laga et al. 1 21.975275%
15 Jayanti et al. 2 20.165302%
16 Jayanti et al. 1 18.170412%
17 Jayanti et al. 3 17.071058%
Mean Second Tier(highly relevant)
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 27.864994%
2 Makadia et al. 1 26.62621%
3 Daras et al. 1 25.666513%
4 Shilane et al. 3 25.636763%
5 Papadakis et al. 1 25.61255%
6 Zaharia et al. 1 25.017164%
7 Shilane et al. 2 24.700417%
8 Chaouch et al. 1 22.85992%
9 Chaouch et al. 2 21.08477%
10 Shilane et al. 1 19.622356%
11 Makadia et al. 3 18.875776%
12 Makadia et al. 4 18.24685%
13 Laga et al. 2 16.23685%
14 Laga et al. 1 15.25855%
15 Jayanti et al. 2 12.220893%
16 Jayanti et al. 3 11.635786%
17 Jayanti et al. 1 11.074168%
Mean Second Tier(relevant)
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Shilane et al. 2 26.582304%
2 Shilane et al. 3 26.259089%
3 Makadia et al. 2 25.224678%
4 Zaharia et al. 1 24.629854%
5 Papadakis et al. 1 24.24718%
6 Makadia et al. 1 24.129862%
7 Daras et al. 1 24.085535%
8 Shilane et al. 1 21.903856%
9 Chaouch et al. 1 21.182837%
10 Chaouch et al. 2 20.01698%
11 Makadia et al. 3 16.528067%
12 Makadia et al. 4 15.707082%
13 Laga et al. 1 15.605778%
14 Laga et al. 2 15.239635%
15 Jayanti et al. 2 14.42155%
16 Jayanti et al. 1 13.036657%
17 Jayanti et al. 3 12.791278%
Mean Dynamic Average Recall
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.5498626
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.54084843
3 Daras et al. 1 0.5242406
4 Chaouch et al. 1 0.50018275
5 Papadakis et al. 1 0.49523294
6 Shilane et al. 3 0.4937149
7 Zaharia et al. 1 0.49247277
8 Shilane et al. 2 0.48770607
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.42156762
10 Shilane et al. 1 0.39706558
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.39249521
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.37667266
13 Laga et al. 1 0.32631385
14 Laga et al. 2 0.30619973
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.26785165
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.2370221
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.23020707
Mean Normalized Cumulated Gain @5
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Daras et al. 1 0.68666667
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.6866666
3 Shilane et al. 3 0.68
4 Makadia et al. 2 0.6633333
5 Chaouch et al. 1 0.6566667
6 Papadakis et al. 1 0.65333337
7 Shilane et al. 2 0.6499999
8 Zaharia et al. 1 0.6433334
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.58666664
10 Makadia et al. 3 0.56333333
11 Shilane et al. 1 0.53000003
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.5266666
13 Laga et al. 1 0.49666673
14 Laga et al. 2 0.46666664
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.41333336
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.34333327
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.3
Mean Normalized Cumulated Gain @10
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.6123611
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.6070833
3 Daras et al. 1 0.6017763
4 Papadakis et al. 1 0.593443
5 Chaouch et al. 1 0.58320177
6 Shilane et al. 3 0.5756653
7 Shilane et al. 2 0.5573831
8 Zaharia et al. 1 0.5501096
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.52070177
10 Makadia et al. 3 0.46868423
11 Shilane et al. 1 0.4493787
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.43826762
13 Laga et al. 1 0.39941522
14 Laga et al. 2 0.36566523
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.31548974
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.2633002
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.26208335
Mean Normalized Cumulated Gain @25
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.549824
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.52457047
3 Daras et al. 1 0.52351165
4 Shilane et al. 3 0.5190807
5 Papadakis et al. 1 0.4988662
6 Zaharia et al. 1 0.48677504
7 Shilane et al. 2 0.48182333
8 Chaouch et al. 1 0.48067188
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.4413401
10 Shilane et al. 1 0.37679142
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.3700427
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.3519792
13 Laga et al. 2 0.3104431
14 Laga et al. 1 0.30671543
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.2598747
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.22084087
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.21214458
Mean Normalized Cumulated Gain @50
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.55366397
2 Shilane et al. 3 0.5340768
3 Makadia et al. 1 0.53389996
4 Daras et al. 1 0.52014875
5 Papadakis et al. 1 0.5162894
6 Shilane et al. 2 0.50987726
7 Zaharia et al. 1 0.48073068
8 Chaouch et al. 1 0.4753756
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.44644466
10 Shilane et al. 1 0.40099803
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.38889214
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.3554005
13 Laga et al. 2 0.32345307
14 Laga et al. 1 0.3205712
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.27093607
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.2416933
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.23489621
Mean Normalized Cumulated Gain @100
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.59063977
2 Papadakis et al. 1 0.58363205
3 Makadia et al. 1 0.56290364
4 Daras et al. 1 0.55910426
5 Shilane et al. 2 0.55472845
6 Shilane et al. 3 0.54925483
7 Zaharia et al. 1 0.5224779
8 Chaouch et al. 1 0.503831
9 Shilane et al. 1 0.45976147
10 Chaouch et al. 2 0.45332292
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.43768805
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.3916625
13 Laga et al. 2 0.3417156
14 Laga et al. 1 0.33722803
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.33036745
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.30116224
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.28585094
Mean Normalized Discounted Cumulated Gain @5
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Daras et al. 1 0.70158577
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.6977325
3 Shilane et al. 3 0.69247633
4 Chaouch et al. 1 0.68250453
5 Makadia et al. 2 0.67948586
6 Shilane et al. 2 0.667565
7 Zaharia et al. 1 0.66745985
8 Papadakis et al. 1 0.66591275
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.59366554
10 Makadia et al. 3 0.58877
11 Makadia et al. 4 0.56011623
12 Shilane et al. 1 0.55741596
13 Laga et al. 1 0.5264585
14 Laga et al. 2 0.49297804
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.43654123
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.36803645
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.34211314
Mean Normalized Discounted Cumulated Gain @10
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Daras et al. 1 0.6447029
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.6428936
3 Makadia et al. 2 0.64282435
4 Chaouch et al. 1 0.62863
5 Papadakis et al. 1 0.62389594
6 Shilane et al. 3 0.62257665
7 Shilane et al. 2 0.60229075
8 Zaharia et al. 1 0.60051906
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.54900736
10 Makadia et al. 3 0.5204231
11 Shilane et al. 1 0.49784642
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.49476814
13 Laga et al. 1 0.4566308
14 Laga et al. 2 0.4200712
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.36674303
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.30915537
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.30314
Mean Normalized Discounted Cumulated Gain @25
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.5906021
2 Daras et al. 1 0.5790902
3 Makadia et al. 1 0.5768538
4 Shilane et al. 3 0.5664072
5 Papadakis et al. 1 0.5482698
6 Chaouch et al. 1 0.5469625
7 Zaharia et al. 1 0.5399632
8 Shilane et al. 2 0.53455895
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.48525622
10 Makadia et al. 3 0.44044456
11 Shilane et al. 1 0.4300153
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.4215276
13 Laga et al. 1 0.3765074
14 Laga et al. 2 0.36147305
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.310237
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.26501364
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.253685
Mean Normalized Discounted Cumulated Gain @50
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.58311766
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.57122463
3 Daras et al. 1 0.5627933
4 Shilane et al. 3 0.560674
5 Papadakis et al. 1 0.5427566
6 Shilane et al. 2 0.5359957
7 Chaouch et al. 1 0.5274883
8 Zaharia et al. 1 0.52680373
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.47129437
10 Makadia et al. 3 0.43423268
11 Shilane et al. 1 0.43022183
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.41051653
13 Laga et al. 1 0.36939204
14 Laga et al. 2 0.35609832
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.3012475
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.26463157
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.2545676
Mean Normalized Discounted Cumulated Gain @100
Rank Participant RunNr Value
1 Makadia et al. 2 0.5914547
2 Makadia et al. 1 0.57657075
3 Daras et al. 1 0.5697008
4 Papadakis et al. 1 0.5612176
5 Shilane et al. 3 0.55399626
6 Shilane et al. 2 0.54691064
7 Zaharia et al. 1 0.5352322
8 Chaouch et al. 1 0.52931577
9 Chaouch et al. 2 0.4615041
10 Shilane et al. 1 0.44907773
11 Makadia et al. 3 0.44294664
12 Makadia et al. 4 0.4129984
13 Laga et al. 1 0.36840227
14 Laga et al. 2 0.35428196
15 Jayanti et al. 2 0.31652725
16 Jayanti et al. 3 0.2823436
17 Jayanti et al. 1 0.2733193

Graphs:

MNCGvsSM100 MNDCGvsSM100